GMAT和GRE考試都有邏輯題，而且難度都不低，很多考生都對這個題型束手無策。那么，考生能否通過互相借鑒來提升邏輯能力，兩門考試的邏輯題存在哪些共同點和區(qū)別呢?下面小編就來為大家做詳細(xì)分析。
GRE&GMAT邏輯推理題題型對比
1. 自2002年，美國ETS將原GRE考試中包含邏輯推理(Logical Reasoning)的Analytical Section取消，替換為分析性寫作(Analytical Writing)。同時，GRE的閱讀部分也包含有專門的邏輯閱讀題型。
2. 在GMAT考試中，邏輯以Critical Reasoning的專有形式進行考試，提供短篇文章供考生分析后解題。
GRE&GMAT邏輯推理題考題實例對比
1. GRE邏輯推理題分析
A recent study of an insurance company s underwriters indicated that those who worked in pleasant physical surroundings were 25 percent more productive than their peers in unpleasant physical surroundings. Objective criteria for evaluating job performance included caseload and complexity of cases. This shows that improving workers environments increases those workers productivity.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A. On average, less-productive employees spend no fewer hours per day at their workstations than do their more-productive peers.(平均而言，生產(chǎn)效率低的雇員并不比他們工作效率高的同事在工作場所花費的時間少)
B. Unpleasant surroundings give employees less motivation to work hard than more pleasant surroundings do.(令人不適的工作環(huán)境，相對于令人舒適的工作環(huán)境來說，更不能激勵雇員賣力工作)
C. The more-productive employees are generally rewarded with pleasant office space.
More-product(效率較高的雇員通常被回報以令人舒適的工作環(huán)境)
D.ive employees do not work any more hours than their less-productive peers.(效率較高的雇員并不比效率低的同事工作時間長)
E. Peer pressure discourages employees in crowded, unpleasant surroundings from making phone calls to their own family members during work time。(同行的壓力使得在擁擠、令人不適的環(huán)境里工作的雇員不能在工作時間給家人打電話)
譯文：最近對一家保險公司的保險商的研究表明，處在令人舒適的工作環(huán)境中的員工要比處在不大舒服環(huán)境的員工的工作效率要高25%。所以評價工作業(yè)績也需要和工作與案例的復(fù)雜程度有關(guān)系。這表明，改善員工的工作環(huán)境可以提高工作效率。
以上哪項結(jié)論，如果正確可以削弱以上結(jié)論。
推理分析：段落推理是通過一項研究的結(jié)果：處在令人舒適的工作環(huán)境中的員工要比處在不大舒服環(huán)境的員工的工作效率要高25%，得出段落結(jié)論: 改善員工的工作環(huán)境可以提高工作效率.但是結(jié)果中的效率高和工作環(huán)境好二者誰導(dǎo)致誰，并不知道，所以得出工作環(huán)境好導(dǎo)致效率高。
本段是典型的Weaken題，重點在于結(jié)論。A、D的觀點是效率低和效率高的員工的相同點，不能起到，Weaken的作用，B是支持結(jié)論，E是新觀點making phone。選擇C效率高導(dǎo)致工作環(huán)境好，與段落推理明顯沖突，所以C是最佳答案。
2. GMAT邏輯推理題分析
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune system activity. The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion would be most seriously weakened if it were true that
(A) there was a one-year delay between the completion of a pilot study for the experiment and the initiation of the experiment itself(在針對試驗性研究的完成與開始試驗本身之間有一年的間隔時間)
(B) people’s levels of immune-system activity are not affected by their use of medications(人們的免疫系統(tǒng)活性水平?jīng)]有受到他們服用的藥物的影響)
(C) a few people with high immune-system activity had scores on the test of mental health that were similar to the scores of people who had normal immune-system activity(免疫系統(tǒng)活性高的一些人在心理測試方面的得分一樣)
(D) people who have low immune-system activity tend to contract more viral infections than do people with normal or high immune-system activity(與免疫系統(tǒng)活性正�；蚋叩娜讼啾�，免疫系統(tǒng)活性低的人更易得過濾性毒菌引起的感染)
(E) high levels of stress first cause mental illness and then cause decreased immune-system activity in normal individuals(高度壓力首先導(dǎo)致心理疾病，然后導(dǎo)致正常人的免疫系統(tǒng)活性的降低)
邏輯分析：段落推理為“該研究人員從免疫系統(tǒng)活性水平低與心理健康的低分?jǐn)?shù)的聯(lián)系中，得出結(jié)論，免疫系統(tǒng)活性實際上可以抑制心理疾病。但是不清楚兩者之間誰可以導(dǎo)致誰，所以結(jié)論就過于武斷，錯誤的可能性很高。
所以本題是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的反對題，A、“間隔時間”與上述結(jié)論無關(guān)，B對推理毫無作用，C是共同點，不可能起到反對的作用，D與“心理健康測試”無關(guān),E的內(nèi)容如果實現(xiàn)就是因果倒置，最能削弱研究結(jié)論，所以是正確答案。
GRE&GMAT邏輯推理題對比總結(jié)
通過以上的例題分析，GRE與GMAT考試在邏輯推理部分，考查類型、問題目的類型、答案選擇和思維模式都大致相同，所以考生可以這兩相結(jié)合的進行復(fù)習(xí)備考，對于考生邏輯推理能力的提升，會有意想不到的效果。
以上就是關(guān)于GRE GMAT 邏輯推理題對比的經(jīng)驗分享，希望通過兩種題型的分析，對于考生邏輯備考有所幫助。
